BRAIN TALK DEPT
A new study says pain is all in your head--and now we can see it:
"Researchers say they’ve figured out an objective way to measure pain -- by imaging the brain’s response, in real time.
They
 used a type of brain scanner called functional magnetic resonance 
imaging, or fMRI, to take pictures of people’s responses to pain. And 
they documented that a morphine-based painkiller reduces both the pain 
that people reported they felt, and the pain that registered on the 
brain scan.
The test will be useful not as a pain lie detector 
test, but as a way to objectively measure pain, treatments for pain, 
pain in patients who can’t talk or who can’t talk well, and pain in 
people who are unconscious, the researchers report in the New England 
Journal of Medicine.
They worked out an algorithm -- a kind of computer equation -- that 
could directly correlate the brain images with the degree of pain that 
people felt.
“We can make an accurate prediction about how much pain a 
person is feeling,” says Tor Dessart Wager of the University of 
Colorado, who helped lead the four studies detailed on Wednesday.
Other
 pain experts say the findings look like they will hold up. "I think it 
will help transform pain medicine," said Dr. David Borsook of Harvard 
Children's Hospital, an expert on pain imaging.
Wager's team is 
not the first to try using fMRI to measure pain. Sean Mackey at Stanford
 University published a similar report in 2011 in the Public Library of 
Science journal PloS ONE. Irene Tracey, of Britain’s Oxford University, 
is among several other groups trying to finesse the technique.
Wager’s
 team, working with colleagues at New York University, Johns Hopkins 
University and the University of Michigan, got 114 volunteers to agree 
to have hot plates applied to their arms while undergoing fMRI.
Temperatures went from a pleasantly warm 39 degrees C (102 degrees Fahrenheit) to 49 degrees (120 F).
“We
 can tell which one was more painful for you with 90- to 100-percent 
accuracy,” Wager says. The method was so sensitive, he says, that the 
team, was able to tell, by looking at the fMRI alone, if a volunteer was
 being touched with a plate at 48 degrees or 49 degrees.
The tests
 also confirmed that people do perceive pain differently, Wager says. 
“Let’s say I give you a 48-degrees stimulus and you go ‘This is okay; I 
can handle it’ and I might say ‘Oh, this really hurts’,” he said. “My 
brain is going to respond more strongly than yours. We are using this to
 track what people say they feel.”
It’s an independent way to 
measure actual pain. “You could be saying you don’t feel so much pain 
just because you are stoic,” Wager said.
But, Wager said, the 
scans should not be used to try to prove people are faking pain. He 
stresses they tested only healthy people who were not feeling pain 
because of disease or injury. Pain caused by wounds or illness might 
show up differently, he says. And some types of pain, like the pain 
caused by fibromyalgia, might affect different brain systems, he says.
“There
 are different things that people call pain and multiple treatments that
 influence pain and we think they work through different systems,” Wager
 says.
“There is really still a mystery about where in all these 
circuits the experience actually emerges,” he said. “The brain is 
complicated place. It’s easy to find things that look true but aren’t 
true.”
Earlier, the team had reported that social pain, such as 
rejection, causes the brain to activate in much the same way as physical
 pain. They tested this idea using the fMRI. It totally failed.
“One
 of the experiments is one in which everybody in the study has been 
romantically rejected,” Wager said. They brought in pictures of their 
exes, and confirmed that they were feeling emotional pain when looking 
at them. But the pain did not show up on the fMRI in the same patterns 
as physical pain. “It wasn’t fooled at all,” Wager said.
And they were also able to show how pain medications worked. In one 
of the experiments, volunteers got a morphine-based drug while they were
 being given near-burns. The brain’s indication of pain changed in 
direct correlation with the concentration of drug in the brain, they 
reported.
But then something interesting happened. In one round of
 experiments, they hooked the volunteers up to a drip and told them they
 were not getting the pain drug yet. But they were. “We fooled them,” 
Wager says.
It’s a well-known effect of pain treatment -- when 
people know they are getting a pain drug, they report less pain. And the
 brain scan confirmed it. When people did not believe they were getting 
the pain medication, they reported that the burning hurt more than the 
brain scan indicated it hurt. In fact, their brain response was the 
same, whether they knew they were getting the painkillers or not.
Next
 up, Wager says it will be important to test different types of pain -- 
pinpricks or cold for example -- and to test people who are experiencing
 pain caused by disease or injuries."
"It is not ease but effort, not facility but 
difficult, that makes man. There is perhaps no station in life in which 
difficulties do not have to be encountered and overcome before any 
decided means of success can be achieved." -Samuel Smiles (1812-1904) 
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment