At least, in one person's opinion. But check this out--I know there are a number of persons with Moebius Syndrome who have tried meeting people online. The key thing is, of course, that one must be careful. But there are other keys to success, too, as this person found; read on:
"(CNN) -- This wasn't a part of the plan. At age 30, I was still single and had no exciting prospects.
Rebounding from a
terrible breakup with my longtime boyfriend, I turned to online dating
to find a suitable mate. I joined Match.com, eHarmony and JDate, a
website for Jewish singles, and decided I would go out with whomever
asked, as long as he didn't seem terrifying.
The first two dates were comically bad.
Date Number One asked me
out to a really nice restaurant, then didn't offer to pay for (or even
split!) the bill. He ordered a very expensive bottle of wine and two
appetizers -- neither of which I got to enjoy -- before moving on to a
three-course meal. While walking back to our cars, he suddenly diverted
to a public park bench where he asked if I wanted a smoke. He then lit
the shaggy end of a large marijuana joint right in front of an
assortment of passersby. He mentioned something about his weed habit and
impotence, but by then I was already running toward my car.
Date Number Two claimed
to be an orthopedic surgeon, but about halfway into our cappuccinos I
mentioned an elbow surgery I'd had and he said that his brother was an
[sic] anesthologist. After struggling to say "anesthesiologist" two more
times, my eyes drifted down to his forearms, where I noticed what
looked like sawdust. As he got deep into the minutiae of mitering wood,
it occurred to me that I was actually out on a date with a carpenter.
And a lying one at that.
In less than a month of
online dating, I came to understand that the algorithms used by dating
sites are ineffective, in large part because they rely on user-generated
data. Most of us tend to answer profile questions about ourselves that
are either aspirational or, in my case, fast and minimal. Bad data in
means bad data out, effectively crippling even the best algorithms.
I discovered that it was
because of my online profile that I was going on bad dates. I didn't
feel like answering question after question about myself, so instead I
copied and pasted from my résumé:
About me:
I'm the CEO of a digital strategy agency that solves strategic
and operational problems related to emerging technology. I lead a
brilliant team that advises a worldwide client base of Fortune 100 and
Global 1000 companies, government agencies, media organizations and
foundations.
There were too many other
fields to complete. What were my favorite books? Best places I've
visited? What I like to do for fun? I scrolled down to the "specialties"
area of my résumé, copied all of the bullet points, and, skipping all
the other sections, pasted them into the "Things I could never live
without":
• Future of technology
• Emerging platforms
• Content management systems
• Monetization
• Fluency in Japanese
• Conversational ability in Mandarin
• Fluency in HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and other web languages
• Emerging platforms
• Content management systems
• Monetization
• Fluency in Japanese
• Conversational ability in Mandarin
• Fluency in HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and other web languages
Of course it's obvious
now how ridiculous it was for me to just slap together my online dating
profile. I hadn't stopped to consider how badly I was representing
myself during that critically important first-impression stage, where my
digital self would be judged, without a filter or explanation, by
potentially hundreds of men.
Yes, my online profile
was bad, but I needed context. And if I were being honest with myself,
I'd admit that I hadn't thought enough about my audience. For whom was I
really searching?
What I discovered about successful online daters was astonishing,
and it's emblematic of things I see people doing elsewhere on the
Internet.
author Amy Webb on her quest online for love
author Amy Webb on her quest online for love
To find out, I launched a short-term experiment.
First I created a giant
list of 72 "ideal husband" characteristics. It included everything from
"likes jazz, but only jazz from the 1920s to the late 1940s" to "must
weigh 20 pounds more than me at all times" to "likes selected Broadway
musicals: 'Chess,' 'Evita.' But not 'Cats.' Must not like 'Cats'!" Then,
in order to prioritize my list, I applied weighted scores to the list
of 72 characteristics. I also built a system to evaluate each and every
man who I met. Unless he scored a minimum of 700 points, I'd refuse to
go out with him, even once.
I also wanted to learn
everything I could about my competition. So I created profiles of 10
male archetypes and spent a month as these men, interacting with 96
women, researching their methods and scraping data from their profiles.
What I discovered about
successful online daters was astonishing, and it's emblematic of things I
see people doing elsewhere on the Internet.
Among the highlights:
Popular profiles used aspirational language, kept descriptions short and
general, and lied about certain physical characteristics (though not
the ones you're thinking).
Very early on, I'd used
qualitative and quantitative analysis to evaluate language. I could
clearly see that the best-performing profiles were those that read as
easygoing, youthful and spontaneous.
Short profiles that
express just enough information to pique someone's interest performed
best. In my case, I'd written close to 900 words—a dissertation. That
put me in the bottom 8% of all profiles I looked at.
What shocked me was how
many women seemed to be lying about their height. All of the 96 women I
interacted with listed their height as 5'1" - 5'3", even though the
average height of an American woman is 5'4". Though it's not impossible
that 100% of these women were below the average, it's statistically
improbable.
Popular female daters
were friendly and assertive, reaching out to my profiles with casual
messages that would open with "Hey" or "Hi there" and follow with "I
like that you [detail from profile]. I'm interested in [detail] too."
Shortly after I
concluded my experiment on JDate, I logged back in with the super
profile I'd created for myself. It was me, only optimized to attract the
widest possible swath of men. More than 60 contacted me initially, but
none crossed the necessary 700-point threshold.
If someone instant messages you while you're online, go ahead and IM back if you want.
Amy Webb on the 20-hour rule
Amy Webb on the 20-hour rule
Finally, after widening
my geographic search to 100 miles, I found Brian. We chatted online and
on the phone for three weeks and finally agreed to meet in person. Our
first date lasted 14 hours, and for every date after I continued to
marvel as his total point score increased.
I eventually showed him
my 72-point list, explained the experiment and even revealed to him my
scoring framework. He smiled and said that he'd expect nothing less of
me. During our wedding vows, he promised to continue to score as high as
he could for the rest of our lives together.
Amy's rules for online dating:
1. Use aspirational language.
Keep language aspirational, positive and optimistic. Talk in
generalities about your hopes, dreams and passions, as long as those
things are not controversial. Keep your tone conversational and light.
2. Write succinctly.
Keep your profile short but pithy. Aim for between 90 and 100 words,
which works out to about three sentences. Choose your words carefully.
If you're not a good writer, figure out the keywords and points you need
to make, then ask a friend to help you out.
3. Use amazing photos.
Photos should focus on your waist up, unless you have amazing legs.
Then it's OK to include one or two full-body shots in your gallery. The
majority of your photos should be closer up, highlighting your face.
Make eye contact with the camera. Don't stage a smile. Instead, try to
laugh just before the shot is taken.
4. Don't try to be funny.
If you want to use humor, write whatever you're planning to say down
and show it to some friends or co-workers. Have them read it aloud. With
your tone of voice and inflection, it may be hilarious—but out of your
friend's mouth it may fall flat or even be offensive.
5. Don't use specifics.
Avoid mentioning specific comedians, shows, books, musicians or movies
unless those are top-tier attributes on your list. It's possible to be
generic about what you like while still being specific enough to sound
interesting. Just because you like Louis C.K. or Larry David doesn't
mean that a potential suitor does. Unless that comedian is one of your
deal-breakers, leave him or her off your profile.
6. Avoid controversy.
If you think there's something about what you've done in life that may
be controversial or open for interpretation in a way that disadvantages
you, then leave it off. I'm talking about political or activist work
here, not things like jail time.
7. Downplay your accomplishments (but only initially).
Women: if you've won a Pulitzer or climbed Mount Everest or for some
reason own a jet, this is wonderful news—just don't share it online.
These are the types of details to work into a conversation on your first
or second date. If someone introduced himself to you at a party, would
the next thing out of your mouth be items off your CV? Of course not, so
don't act that way online. Most people don't want to see a list of what
you've done unless they're hiring you for a job.
8. Flirt wisely.
Be careful while flirting online, since it's easy to sound too
aggressive too soon. The best way to flirt is to care deeply about
whatever your date is saying and to focus all of your attention on him
or her. We're flattered when people throw attention our way. So ask
thoughtful questions. Take a keen interest in the conversation. Be
enthusiastic. If you wouldn't use your cheesy line in person, don't use
it digitally.
9. Use the 20 hour rule.
If someone instant messages you while you're online, go ahead and IM
back if you want. Otherwise, wait 20 to 23 hours between e-mail contacts
for the first few messages. I found that successful daters waited that
amount of time and as a result still seemed eager without coming off as
desperate.
10. Don't act like a stalker.
Avoid sending any messages while most people are sleeping, even if
you're wide awake. Shoot for business hours or just after dinnertime."
"If I made it, it's half because I was game enough to take a lot of punishment along the way and half because there were a lot of people who cared enough to help me."--Althea Gibson
No comments:
Post a Comment